AI Workspace

A secure AI workspace for the whole organisation.

Give teams a secure workspace with approved AI models, company knowledge and business systems, deployed in the organisation’s own environment or one managed by Agile Labs.

How do we let staff use AI without exposing company information?

Agile Labs deploys a workspace in the organisation’s own environment, where staff reach approved models through one controlled route and every request is recorded. It answers from company knowledge under each person’s existing permissions, so it returns what that person is already entitled to open and nothing more. We connect the business systems teams actually use, then either operate the workspace as a service or hand it over for the organisation to run itself.

PAVURE

A private AI workspace, ready for an enterprise review.

Pavure gives an organisation one place to use AI with control over its data, its model access and what the AI can reach. Agile Labs assessed it against what an enterprise buyer examines, then built the controls: one route for model access, tightened permissions, limits on what agents may do, and logging that shows what was allowed or blocked.

  • Identity
  • Approved models
  • Company knowledge
  • Record
Read the Pavure story
The Pavure workspace answering from company knowledge, with the source cited

What separates it from a chat tool

One place instead of a dozen

Approved models, company knowledge and the systems the work runs on, in one environment — and the environment is the company’s own. Nothing is copied into anyone else’s index.

Existing permissions, respected

Every answer is drawn only from what the person asking could already open, enforced at the moment the question is asked rather than filtered afterwards.

Sensitive work stays where it is put

Private or in-country models take what cannot leave; the strongest available model takes everything else. One interface covers both, and the boundary is fixed in writing.

The models are the company’s choice

Providers retire and replace models on their own schedule. The workspace is built so a model can be swapped without rebuilding anything around it.

Everything is logged

Who asked, what was retrieved, which model answered and what it cost — kept in the form a regulator or a customer’s auditor asks to see.

The bill arrives before the shock does

Budgets run per team and per model, enforced when the request is made rather than discovered on the invoice.

Deployment, then operation

01DESIGN

Define what the workspace connects to

IdentityAI modelsKnowledgeBusiness systems

Decide what is approved, where each model runs, and what data it can access.

02BUILD

Deploy it in the company’s environment

AI modelsCompany dataBusiness toolsAI Workspace

Build the workspace, routing, retrieval and audit layer in the company’s own infrastructure.

03PERMISSIONS

Fix access before AI exposes it

UserPermissionsCompany data

Review and correct access so the AI only returns information each user is allowed to see.

04GO LIVE

Open access with controls in place

StaffAI WorkspaceApprovedmodelsCompanydataBusinesstoolsAudit log

Launch once identity, budgets, connections and logging are verified.

05OPERATE

Keep the workspace governed

ModelschangePermissionschangeToolschangeMonitor, update, reviewOngoing audit record

We maintain the controls, integrations and audit record as the environment changes.

Managed Workspace

A deployed workspace drifts. Providers change models underneath it, permissions regrow, staff connect new tools, and spend moves with usage. The monthly service exists because the record the workspace produces has to keep being produced.

New tools are reviewed before they are approved

Anything asking to connect is assessed against what it would reach and what its contract permits, and the decision is recorded either way.

Permissions are watched, not audited once

Sprawl returns within months without a standing cadence. Access to the knowledge the workspace can read is reviewed on a schedule rather than after an incident.

Spend is held to a budget

Per-team budgets at the gateway, deviation alarms against a trailing baseline, and attribution that names the workload rather than the company.

Models are kept current as providers change them

Deprecations tracked ahead of the date, and a fixed question set run on a schedule so a change in behaviour is noticed before users report it.

When organisations call us

Call us when

Staff already use AI tools nobody approved, and nobody can say what leaves in the prompts.An assistant rollout stalled the day someone saw what it could reach.The monthly AI bill outgrew what anyone approved.A financial institution preparing for the MAS Guidelines on AI Risk Management, consulted Nov 2025 to Jan 2026 and not yet issued.

Not us when

A business that wants a cheaper chat tool should buy Copilot or ChatGPT. They are good, and they are cheap.This product is bought for the permissions work and the audit trail; where nobody owns that problem yet, there is nothing here worth paying for.

Have something complex to build, fix or take over?

A conversation with the engineers who would deploy it — and a straight answer when a chat subscription is the better buy.